Originally posted on Nice Deb:
Chairman Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) accused the CIA of secretly removing documents, searching computers used by the committee and attempting to intimidate congressional investigators by requesting an FBI inquiry of their conduct — charges that CIA Director John Brennan disputed within hours of her appearance on the Senate floor.
Feinstein described the escalating conflict as a “defining moment” for Congress’s role in overseeing the nation’s intelligence agencies and cited “grave concerns” that the CIA had “violated the separation-of-powers principles embodied in the United States Constitution.”
Brennan fired back during a previously scheduled speech in Washington, saying that “when the facts come out on this, I think a…
View original 170 more words
Re. Camile Paglia: Woman of the Year
Heres the thing. When you experience some sort of medical symptom such as a rash, you might choose to go to a doctor. What you are typically doing is asking that doctor to render an opinion as to what might be going on. The doctor will use a combination of medical signs e.g., measurable things like blood pressure or bacteria in the urine, observing the rash, taking a biopsy the rash, et al and medical symptoms i.e., asking the patient what it feels like or what they have been experiencing. Opinion is rendered, treatment prescribed, behavior proscribed, etcetera, to ameliorate the problem.
If what you want is hard, irrefutable evidence that Western Civilization is experiencing collapse, which collapse might be defined as radical, rapid change (it can be relatively slow) that harms the prospects of its inhabitants and that many might view as bad overall, then we will probably have to wait for its collapse. Im sure there were plenty of people in Rome saying that the Visigoths were no big deal and nothing had changed as the water in the pot reached boiling. But wasnt that the point of the 1960s freak movement? A call that civilization was indeed in a bad way and things needed to change.
Point is that one may easily parrot the de jour talking points of the left that either all is just fine or all is going to hell if we don’t get a lot more government control a la MSNBC, CNN, and on ad infinitum. Demanding so-called absolute, unalloyed facts/truth before we dare to adjust our fair republics current trajectory seems to be madness, especially since so many of our brightest diagnosticians seem to believe that said trajectory apparently will quickly intersect with an immovable object we might call reality.
Me? I don’t want to wait until we hit the barrier. I want to hear from those diagnosticians and make a judgement call as to whether we jink the car left or right. Seems left is causing a lot of damage. We need to jink right a bit. Whos crazy or not? Rather than listening to the screeching and wails on the left that we need more government control of every aspect of our commerce and medical care to the likes of scolds like Kathleen Sebelius and Ezekiel Emanuel, to give unfettered war making powers to the nit-wit in the White House and his crazed enablers at the State Department, its much easier right now for me to listen to the likes of Camile Paglia, David Mamet, Christopher Hitchens, Peter Hitchens, George Will, Charles Krauthammer, Heather MacDonald, Thomas Sowell, Peggy Noonan, Victor Davis Hanson Jonah Goldberg, Ross Douthat, Roger Kimball and a host of other public intellectuals that posit that perhaps all is not quite right in Paradise.
Originally posted on Reflections, Reflections by Alessandra:
On a recent McCain thread (Miley Cyrus: Insult to Injury), a commenter (Joe) asked:
What in Alexandra’s estimation is a “wholesome sexuality”? If it hurt’s someone it’s immoral if it doesn’t then who cares if people want to have anal sex, engage in S&M, cross dress, worship feet, have threesomes, etc. It’s no one’s business. I’m sure most people here agree with that. if not, then what is wholesome sexuality? Sex done only for pro-creation in the missionary position with the lights off?
I have to say this question lies at the heart of what is wrong with liberal ideology. It’s very important and the answer doesn’t fit in a short comment space. But here is a first attempt at a short reply.
We can look at sexuality in many ways. One is to examine what happens inside the mind of an individual. If their sexual thoughts or…
View original 986 more words
A key Augustine insight was that “evil is not something substantial, but rather a type of non-being, a lack of some perfection that ought to be present.”
From Real Science Blog…
Originally posted on Real Science:
Obama says that hurricanes are getting worse, based on some research done at the Choom Climatological Institute.
As we approach the end of August, there have been no Atlantic hurricanes. By this date in the year 1886, there had already been seven hurricanes – including three major hurricanes, one of which wiped the city of Indianola, Texas off the map.
A kinder, gentler natural hurricane from 1886
Obama’s presidency has also seen the fewest US hurricane landfalls of any president. Three hurricanes have hit the US while he was in office, compared to twenty-six while Grover Cleveland was in office.